Review Process Overview
All papers submitted to Wulfenia undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure the highest standards of academic quality and integrity. Our review process is designed to be thorough, fair, and constructive.
Review Stages
1. Initial Screening
Upon submission, papers are first reviewed by the Editorial Board for:
- Relevance to journal scope
- Adherence to submission guidelines
- Basic scientific merit
- Originality and novelty
2. Peer Review
Papers that pass initial screening are sent to three expert reviewers in the relevant field. Reviewers evaluate:
- Scientific validity and methodology
- Significance of the contribution
- Clarity of presentation
- Appropriate citations and references
3. Editorial Decision
Based on reviewer feedback, the Editor-in-Chief makes one of the following decisions:
- Accept: Paper accepted for publication
- Minor Revision: Small changes required
- Major Revision: Significant changes required
- Reject: Paper not suitable for publication
Reviewer Guidelines
Reviewers are expected to provide constructive, unbiased feedback. All reviews are confidential. We are always looking for qualified reviewers to join our panel.