This study explores the intersection of philosophy, religion, and the clouding of
academic research, analysing how philosophical and religious frameworks shape
the production, interpretation, and dissemination of knowledge. The concept of
“clouding” is examined, focusing on how certain biases arising from philosophical
orientations, or metaphysical assumptions, and doctrinal beliefs can obscure
objective academic inquiry. Through a historical and contemporary lens, this work
investigates the role of religious doctrines and philosophical ideologies in
influencing research methodologies, outcomes, and academic discourse. Case
studies are employed and utilised to highlight instances where academic work has
been significantly impacted by religious, or philosophical bias, questioning the
neutrality and integrity of such research. In line with these challenges, the study
proposes strategies for mitigating the clouding effect, emphasising the importance
of objectivity, critical thinking, and interdisciplinary approaches in academic
research. The paper ultimately argues for a more conscious and reflective approach
to academic inquiry, where both philosophical and religious perspectives are
carefully considered without compromising research outcome.